File the bug from the ticket. Tell the customer when it's fixed.
You see the bug first, with the screenshot, the error and the customer's name on it. Now you file it to engineering from the chat you already have open, in one message. Your AI reads the evidence, asks what engineering would, sizes it, and routes it. When it lands, the receipt comes back to your thread, ready to forward.
From "escalated to engineering" to a fix with a receipt.
Retyped by hand, missing the console output, filed under a component nobody owns.
The screenshot, the error and the customer's name travel with it. Your AI reads them and asks only what is missing.
You search the tracker, then Slack, then ask. Three customers report the same thing as three tickets.
Intake reads the product map and says what is already open in that area. The third report joins the first and raises its demand.
Nobody knows, because nobody sized it.
Sized before anyone starts, from how long that kind of fix took here before. Ask "where is ENG-503?" and get the answer in the same chat.
Built for the shape of a bug report.
A bug arrives with evidence and a customer, not a spec. Intake treats it that way: it reads the error before asking anything, it asks who is blocked and by when instead of what done looks like, and it marks the worth by the accounts waiting, so a fix for three customers routes ahead of a nice-to-have. Repeat reports join the open item rather than filing a fourth.
Free for the whole support team, forever.
A member of the workspace is enough to file, answer and check status. Seats are for the people who build.
Claude, ChatGPT or Cowork, and a Slack DM for the questions that come back. Nothing new to open.
When the engineer needs something, it lands in your chat. Reply with a word and it goes on the item.
What changed, when, what it cost. Close the ticket with it.
File the next bug from the ticket.
Request an invite. Every support rep can file from day one, with no seat.
https://mcp.sleds.ai/mcp